Tartu Ülikool

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Estonia
Founded
1632
Type
Education
ROR
03z77qz90
FWUR Rank#456 globally (of 4.980)#1 in Estonia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 73,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 228–1.676 (1.448 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#301, most generous score) and ARWU (#501, harshest score).

RUR
228[src]of 1.128
THE
301[src]of 2.119
QS
362[src]of 1.462
ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
527[src]of 1.929
SCImago
1.676[src]of 4.699
FWUR
456of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS2,2
  • THE12,8
  • ARWU23,3
  • CWUR0,3
  • RUR6,8
  • SCImago8,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
57,1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
80,6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
76,3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #456 · 73.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
57.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
80.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
76.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 73.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#527
cwur.org
RUR2025
#228
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1676
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1638 → #1279 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲3#425QS▼59#358THE▼100#301ARWU▲100#601CWUR▲14#515RUR▲129#233SCImago▼41#1279
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1638
2010#436#1596
2011#501#446#1568
2012#501#350#502#1414
2013#461#351#497#1249
2014#351#556#1212
2015#379#537#530#1129
2016#400#351#401#506#408#915
2017#347#301#301#477#388#891
2018#314#301#301#490#333#1150
2019#321#301#301#502#335#548
2020#301#301#401#516#310#1195
2021#285#251#401#521#280#1100
2022#300#251#501#526#256#1092
2023#299#201#701#529#362#1238
2024#358#301#601#515#233#1279

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Tallinna Tehnikaülikool1250.0
2Tallinna Ülikool1278.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources