Tallinna Ülikool

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Estonia
Founded
2005
Type
Education
ROR
05mey9k78
FWUR Rank#1.278 globally (of 4.980)#3 in Estonia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 38,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–7.893 (6.992 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.001, most generous score) and SCImago (#7.893, harshest score).

QS
901[src]of 1.462
THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
SCImago
7.893[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.278of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE14,4
  • SCImago38,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
45,6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,278 · 38.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
45.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 38.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#7893
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3814 → #7720 (2011–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲315#1533QS▲98#1001THE#1001ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▼771#7720
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011#3814
2012#4045
2013#4347
2014#4515
2015#4579
2016#4343
2017#4023
2018#2478
2019#801#1235
2020#801#801#4962
2021#801#801#5928
2022#1001#1001#6266
2023#1099#1001#6949
2024#1001#1001#7720

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Tallinna Tehnikaülikool1250.0
2Tartu Ülikool456.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources