The University of Georgia

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Georgia
Founded
1785
Type
Education
ROR
02bjhwk41
FWUR Rank#568 globally (of 4.980)#1 in Georgia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 67/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 301–6.498 (6.197 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#351, most generous score) and SCImago (#6.498, harshest score).

ARWU
301[src]of 996
THE
351[src]of 2.119
QS
525[src]of 1.462
SCImago
6.498[src]of 4.699
FWUR
568of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS2,9
  • THE16,5
  • ARWU2,9
  • SCImago67

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
34,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
73,8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #568 · 67
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
34.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
73.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 67 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#6498
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

ARWU fell #101 → #401 (2005–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼73#616QS▲119#514THE▲250#351ARWU▼100#401CWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImagoNo data
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#101
2006#102
2007#102
2008#101
2009#101
2010#101
2011#102
2012#201#101
2013#201#101
2014#276#151
2015#431#276#151
2016#401#251#201
2017#431#301#201
2018#421#351#201
2019#431#401#201
2020#474#401#201
2021#501#401#201
2022#541#351#301
2023#633#601#301
2024#514#351#401

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University1964.0
2Ilia State University2011.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources