Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Updated 9 Mei 2026
Country
Georgia
Founded
1918
Type
Education
ROR
05fd1hd85
FWUR Rank#1.964 globally (of 4.980)#2 in Georgia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 23,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 951–8.438 (7.487 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#1.106, most generous score) and SCImago (#8.438, harshest score).

QS
951[src]of 1.462
RUR
1.056[src]of 1.128
CWUR
1.106[src]of 1.929
THE
1.501[src]of 2.119
SCImago
8.438[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.964of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS11,5
  • THE5,6
  • CWUR19,1
  • RUR17,1
  • SCImago23,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
32,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
24,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,964 · 23.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
32.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
24.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 23.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1106
cwur.org
RUR2025
#1056
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#8438
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3801 → #7732 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼195#1787QS▼191#801THE#1501ARWUNo dataCWUR▼116#1047RUR▼17#976SCImago▼629#7732
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3801
2010#4018
2011#4250
2012#4478
2013#4708
2014#4735
2015#4655
2016#624#4708
2017#801#712#4891
2018#1001#601#5018
2019#1001#1073#614#2150
2020#1001#885#612#5622
2021#601#1001#852#637#5100
2022#571#1201#875#763#7255
2023#610#1501#931#959#7103
2024#801#1501#1047#976#7732

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ilia State University2011.0
2Georgian Technical University2100.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityAmerika Serikat1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityTiongkok17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources