University of Iowa

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1847
Type
Education
ROR
036jqmy94
FWUR Rank#291 globally (of 4,980)#82 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 82.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 160–530 (370 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#160, most generous score) and QS (#530, harshest score).

CWUR
160[src]of 1,929
RUR
175[src]of 1,128
THE
301[src]of 2,119
ARWU
301[src]of 996
SCImago
505[src]of 4,699
QS
530[src]of 1,462
FWUR
291of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS18.6
  • THE3.4
  • ARWU12.5
  • CWUR9.4
  • RUR2.2
  • SCImago6.9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
79.6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
74.8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
88.2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #291 · 82.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
79.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
74.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
88.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 82.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#160
cwur.org
RUR2025
#175
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#505
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS fell #188 → #491 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼43#272QS▼21#491THE▲100#201ARWU▼100#301CWUR▼1#146RUR▼11#181SCImago▼52#438
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#101
2006#95
2007#97
2008#101
2009#101#138
2010#188#101#96#156
2011#192#132#102#123#179
2012#199#141#101#152#205
2013#236#169#101#160#201
2014#161#151#125#182#211
2015#269#175#151#141#160#221
2016#312#201#151#125#115#221
2017#393#201#151#139#113#208
2018#421#201#151#134#122#242
2019#435#201#201#142#136#153
2020#421#201#201#143#138#329
2021#420#201#201#145#129#366
2022#455#251#201#142#150#314
2023#470#301#201#145#170#386
2024#491#201#301#146#181#438

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1The University of Tennessee, Knoxville302.0
2University of Connecticut279.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources