The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Updated May 9, 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1794
Type
Education
ROR
020f3ap87
FWUR Rank#302 globally (of 4,980)#83 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 81.7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–738 (537 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#232, most generous score) and QS (#607, harshest score).

ARWU
201[src]of 996
RUR
212[src]of 1,128
CWUR
232[src]of 1,929
THE
401[src]of 2,119
QS
607[src]of 1,462
SCImago
738[src]of 4,699
FWUR
302of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS23.1
  • THE0.5
  • ARWU1.7
  • CWUR6.4
  • RUR0.4
  • SCImago2.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
82.1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
69.8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
84.7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #302 · 81.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
82.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
69.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
84.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 81.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#232
cwur.org
RUR2025
#212
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#738
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #446 → #618 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼11#281QS▲188#446THE#301ARWU#201CWUR▼3#227RUR▲12#201SCImago▲9#618
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#151
2008#152
2009#152#446
2010#385#151#438
2011#391#151#449
2012#401#151#450
2013#390#151#446
2014#201#227#418
2015#431#151#227#431
2016#451#251#301#239#248#392
2017#461#251#201#253#243#423
2018#451#301#201#254#248#477
2019#419#301#201#273#234#295
2020#407#301#201#249#251#648
2021#432#301#201#251#224#678
2022#541#301#201#254#244#588
2023#634#301#201#224#213#627
2024#446#301#201#227#201#618

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Iowa291.0
2University of Minnesota Health and Medicine315.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustralia27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources