University of Maryland, College Park

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1856
Type
Education
ROR
047s2c258
FWUR Rank#120 globally (of 4,980)#45 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 92.2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 55–287 (232 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#92, most generous score) and RUR (#211, harshest score).

ARWU
55[src]of 996
CWUR
92[src]of 1,929
THE
116[src]of 2,119
QS
207[src]of 1,462
RUR
211[src]of 1,128
SCImago
287[src]of 4,699
FWUR
120of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS6.3
  • THE2.3
  • ARWU2.3
  • CWUR3
  • RUR10.9
  • SCImago1.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
94.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
90.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
88.3CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #120 · 92.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
94.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
90.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
88.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 92.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#92
cwur.org
RUR2025
#211
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#287
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #104 → #250 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲24#112QS▼4#169THE▼10#114ARWU▼8#58CWUR▼8#87RUR▲20#173SCImago▲317#250
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#47
2006#37
2007#79#37
2008#122#37
2009#122#37#104
2010#104#36#80#108
2011#113#98#38#85#116
2012#117#94#38#68#117#131
2013#116#97#38#59#111#137
2014#122#108#43#76#145
2015#122#132#43#72#152#175
2016#126#117#52#68#107#226
2017#131#67#53#80#115#145
2018#129#69#51#47#119#168
2019#126#82#46#99#118#123
2020#136#91#53#76#119#257
2021#152#90#56#75#111#250
2022#158#93#50#76#127#445
2023#165#104#50#79#193#567
2024#169#114#58#87#173#250

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Pittsburgh135.0
2University of Florida136.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources