University of Johannesburg

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
South Africa
Founded
2005
Type
Education
ROR
04z6c2n17
FWUR Rank#555 globally (of 4,980)#5 in South Africa
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 67.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 308–1,664 (1,356 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#351, most generous score) and ARWU (#501, harshest score).

QS
308[src]of 1,462
THE
351[src]of 2,119
RUR
464[src]of 1,128
ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
607[src]of 1,929
SCImago
1,664[src]of 4,699
FWUR
555of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS11.2
  • THE15.7
  • ARWU18
  • CWUR0.8
  • RUR8.8
  • SCImago3.2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
57.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
81.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
63.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #555 · 67.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
57.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
81.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
63.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 67.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#607
cwur.org
RUR2025
#464
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1664
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3175 → #1699 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲94#566QS▲107#306THE▲200#401ARWU▲100#401CWUR▲4#624RUR▲5#490SCImago▲956#1699
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3175
2010#3220
2011#3470
2012#3436
2013#601#3287
2014#3089
2015#601#2807
2016#601#2277
2017#601#601#401#951#2444
2018#601#601#601#790#564#2675
2019#551#601#601#761#544#1057
2020#501#601#601#706#561#2475
2021#439#601#601#674#549#2383
2022#434#601#401#629#564#2513
2023#413#601#501#628#495#2655
2024#306#401#401#624#490#1699

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Pretoria543.0
2University of KwaZulu-Natal573.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2University of Oxford英国5.0
3Tsinghua University中国17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources