University of Cincinnati

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1819
Type
Education
ROR
01e3m7079
FWUR Rank#472 globally (of 4,980)#110 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 74.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 246–721 (475 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#564, most generous score) and QS (#721, harshest score).

CWUR
246[src]of 1,929
THE
251[src]of 1,506
ARWU
301[src]of 996
RUR
469[src]of 1,128
SCImago
564[src]of 4,699
QS
721[src]of 1,462
FWUR
472of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS21.1
  • ARWU2
  • CWUR15.4
  • RUR13.4
  • SCImago16.1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
78.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
67.1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
72.9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2021/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #472 · 74.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
78.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
67.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
72.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 74.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#246
cwur.org
RUR2025
#469
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#564
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

QS fell #275 → #691 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼109#355QS▲44#691THENo dataARWU▼100#301CWUR▲6#235RURNo dataSCImago▲27#518
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#151
2008#152
2009#152#205
2010#275#201#193#199
2011#339#190#201#191#211
2012#389#201#201#222#220
2013#461#226#201#220#212
2014#226#201#177#254#213
2015#471#276#201#157#256#252
2016#501#301#201#165#180#308
2017#551#201#301#176#166#300
2018#501#201#301#204#413
2019#541#251#301#231#240
2020#561#251#201#230#522
2021#601#251#201#236#546
2022#601#301#242#486
2023#735#201#241#545
2024#691#301#235#518

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Tulane University473.0
2Drexel University471.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources