The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1891
Type
Education
ROR
016tfm930
FWUR Rank#631 globally (of 4,980)#135 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 63.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–1,206 (705 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#1,206, most generous score) and ARWU (#501, harshest score).

ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
699[src]of 1,929
SCImago
1,206[src]of 4,699
FWUR
631of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU14
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago10.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
62.1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
63.8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #631 · 63.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
62.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
63.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 63.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#699
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1206
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #448 → #1087 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼30#637QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#401CWUR▲16#701RURNo dataSCImago▼58#1087
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#203
2008#201
2009#303#448
2010#301#446
2011#301#471
2012#301#508
2013#401#544
2014#401#379#587
2015#401#378#656
2016#401#363#642
2017#401#411#613
2018#401#469#719
2019#601#574#332
2020#401#641#744
2021#501#662#799
2022#401#710#898
2023#401#717#1029
2024#401#701#1087

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Stevens Institute of Technology637.0
2West Virginia University625.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources