The Rockefeller University

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1901
Type
Education
ROR
0420db125
FWUR Rank#91 globally (of 4,980)#38 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 94.2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 29–385 (356 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped ARWU (#29, most generous score) and RUR (#331, harshest score).

ARWU
29[src]of 996
CWUR
69[src]of 1,929
RUR
331[src]of 1,128
SCImago
385[src]of 4,699
FWUR
91of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU3
  • CWUR2.3
  • RUR23.4
  • SCImago2.3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
94.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
83.6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #91 · 94.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
94.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
83.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 94.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS2016
Not ranked
topuniversities.com
THE2022
Not ranked
timeshighereducation.com
CWUR2025
#69
cwur.org
RUR2025
#331
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#385
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #125 → #352 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#40020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼1#48QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▲10#29CWUR▼4#65RUR▼6#36SCImago▼34#352
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#30
2006#30
2007#30
2008#32
2009#32#125
2010#34#147
2011#33#161
2012#32#21#186
2013#34#49#209
2014#33#37#243
2015#33#29#247
2016#37#28#272
2017#36#33#111#240
2018#30#76#140#189
2019#35#67#149#103
2020#43#41#161#195
2021#42#49#147#220
2022#44#55#161#374
2023#39#61#30#318
2024#29#65#36#352

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of California, Davis92.0
2Georgia Institute of Technology93.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources