Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
India
Founded
1987
Type
Education
ROR
01defpn95
FWUR Rank#2,240 globally (of 4,980)#120 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 17.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,201–6,499 (5,298 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,201, most generous score) and SCImago (#6,499, harshest score).

QS
1,201[src]of 1,462
THE
1,201[src]of 2,119
SCImago
6,499[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,240of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • THE25.4
  • SCImago17.9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
30.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,240 · 17.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
30.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 17.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#6499
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3089 → #5901 (2012–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲261#1531QS▲87#1001THE#1201ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲1032#5901
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012#3089
2013#3722
2014#4081
2015#4280
2016#3976
2017#801#4148
2018#1001#4564
2019#1001#2310
2020#1001#5825
2021#1001#6074
2022#1201#6837
2023#1088#1201#6933
2024#1001#1201#5901

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Osmania University2238.0
2Galgotias University2227.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2University of Oxford英国5.0
3Tsinghua University中国17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources