Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
Netherlands
Founded
1923
Type
Education
ROR
016xsfp80
FWUR Rank#184 globally (of 4,980)#9 in Netherlands
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 88.6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 87–1,026 (939 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#154, most generous score) and SCImago (#1,026, harshest score).

RUR
87[src]of 1,128
ARWU
101[src]of 996
THE
154[src]of 2,119
CWUR
172[src]of 1,929
QS
279[src]of 1,462
SCImago
1,026[src]of 4,699
FWUR
184of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS7.6
  • THE4.2
  • ARWU1.3
  • CWUR2.5
  • RUR3.8
  • SCImago10.4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
84.1ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
86.9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
91.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #184 · 88.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
84.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
86.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
91.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 88.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#172
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#1026
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #530 → #897 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼7#174QS▲10#222THE▼1#140ARWU#101CWUR▼5#166RUR▲13#95SCImago▲18#897
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#195#151
2008#152
2009#152#530
2010#149#151#150#494
2011#138#102#148#468
2012#136#159#101#159#447
2013#143#127#101#144#438
2014#157#131#101#129#155#436
2015#156#140#101#134#126#419
2016#177#125#101#113#191#408
2017#190#121#101#108#117#422
2018#204#122#101#130#164#652
2019#204#123#101#144#98#319
2020#217#128#101#154#112#712
2021#214#136#101#155#118#726
2022#220#139#101#161#117#784
2023#232#139#101#161#108#915
2024#222#140#101#166#95#897

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam160.0
2Wageningen University & Research141.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources