Queensland University of Technology

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
Australia
Founded
1989
Type
Education
ROR
03pnv4752
FWUR Rank#328 globally (of 4,980)#15 in Australia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 80/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 201–752 (551 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#201, most generous score) and RUR (#346, harshest score).

THE
201[src]of 2,119
QS
226[src]of 1,462
ARWU
301[src]of 996
RUR
346[src]of 1,128
CWUR
355[src]of 1,929
SCImago
752[src]of 4,699
FWUR
328of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS4.6
  • THE10.5
  • ARWU10.2
  • CWUR1.6
  • RUR10.6
  • SCImago4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
76.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
87.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
75.5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #328 · 80
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
76.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
87.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
75.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 80 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#355
cwur.org
RUR2025
#346
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#752
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR climbed #605 → #359 (2014–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲55#259QS▲33#189THE▲2#199ARWU▲100#201CWUR▲14#359RUR▲12#376SCImago▲20#618
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007#195
2008
2009#807
2010#289#382#774
2011#267#391#762
2012#281#276#400#728
2013#279#251#371#677
2014#276#605#339#632
2015#285#276#401#621#344#602
2016#263#251#201#601#277#493
2017#276#201#201#574#340#608
2018#247#201#201#241#281#742
2019#244#201#301#390#297#392
2020#224#179#301#412#259#786
2021#217#186#201#401#249#641
2022#213#193#201#382#312#591
2023#222#201#301#373#388#638
2024#189#199#201#359#376#618

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1RMIT University322.0
2The University of Newcastle352.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2University of Oxford英国5.0
3Tsinghua University中国17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources