Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
Brazil
Founded
1958
Type
Education
ROR
03j1rr444
FWUR Rank#2,512 globally (of 4,980)#45 in Brazil
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 4.7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1,401–7,357 (5,956 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1,501, most generous score) and SCImago (#7,357, harshest score).

QS
1,401[src]of 1,469
THE
1,501[src]of 2,119
SCImago
7,357[src]of 4,699
FWUR
2,512of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE14.6
  • SCImago14.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
17QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,512 · 4.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
17
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 4.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#7357
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3396 → #6193 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼385#2498QSNo dataTHE#1501ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲949#6193
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3396
2010#3594
2011#3654
2012#3855
2013#3828
2014#4034
2015#3745
2016#2514
2017#4582
2018#4344
2019#1698
2020#1001#4842
2021#1001#5581
2022#1201#5965
2023#1408#1501#7142
2024#1501#6193

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universidade Católica de Brasília2565.0
2Universidade de Caxias do Sul2566.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2University of Oxford英国5.0
3Tsinghua University中国17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources