Norges teknisk-naturvitenskaplige universitet

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
Norway
Founded
1996
Type
Education
ROR
05xg72x27
FWUR Rank#234 globally (of 4,980)#2 in Norway
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 85.8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 151–442 (291 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#182, most generous score) and RUR (#222, harshest score).

ARWU
151[src]of 996
CWUR
182[src]of 1,929
RUR
222[src]of 1,128
QS
267[src]of 1,462
THE
301[src]of 2,119
SCImago
442[src]of 4,699
FWUR
234of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS4
  • THE0
  • ARWU0.9
  • CWUR4.8
  • RUR5.4
  • SCImago4.8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
87.8ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
83.8QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
85.5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #234 · 85.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
87.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
83.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
85.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 85.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#182
cwur.org
RUR2025
#222
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#442
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

RUR fell #116 → #260 (2010–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲10#243QS▲60#292THE▲100#301ARWU▼50#151CWUR#178RUR▲186#260SCImago▼19#431
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#201
2007#203
2008#201
2009#201#489
2010#237#201#116#456
2011#266#201#94#428
2012#289#251#201#173#387
2013#251#251#201#172#346
2014#251#201#286#118#331
2015#246#276#101#243#120#303
2016#254#351#101#270#104#276
2017#259#251#101#267#119#344
2018#259#251#101#263#169
2019#363#351#101#162#288#348
2020#359#401#101#178#294#553
2021#360#401#101#182#276#525
2022#369#401#101#176#271#449
2023#352#401#101#178#446#412
2024#292#301#151#178#260#431

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universitetet i Bergen282.0
2Universitetet i Oslo110.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources