New Jersey Institute of Technology

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1881
Type
Education
ROR
05e74xb87
FWUR Rank#797 globally (of 4,980)#157 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 56.7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 395–1,820 (1,425 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#501, most generous score) and ARWU (#801, harshest score).

RUR
395[src]of 1,128
THE
501[src]of 2,119
QS
761[src]of 1,462
ARWU
801[src]of 996
CWUR
918[src]of 1,929
SCImago
1,820[src]of 4,699
FWUR
797of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8.7
  • THE19.7
  • ARWU37
  • CWUR4.2
  • RUR8.4
  • SCImago4.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
40.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
62.2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
58.8CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #797 · 56.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
40.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
62.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
58.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 56.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#918
cwur.org
RUR2025
#395
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#1820
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #755 → #1338 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼5#743QS▲35#641THE▲200#401ARWU#701CWUR▲1#917RUR▲39#457SCImago▲215#1338
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007
2008
2009#755
2010#357#724
2011#343#862
2012#350#440#1050
2013#551#461#1102
2014#661#448#1538
2015#551#761#419#2168
2016#701#501#684#392#1973
2017#701#501#501#747#485#1399
2018#801#501#601#860#500#1392
2019#751#501#901#972#593#674
2020#751#501#901#951#474#1593
2021#751#501#701#948#463#1750
2022#701#501#701#962#504#1937
2023#676#601#701#918#496#1553
2024#641#401#701#917#457#1338

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Lehigh University803.0
2Utah State University811.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources