Karolinska Institutet

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
Sweden
Founded
1810
Type
Education
ROR
056d84691
FWUR Rank#34 globally (of 4,980)#1 in Sweden
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 97.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 13–153 (140 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#13, most generous score) and ARWU (#50, harshest score).

RUR
13[src]of 1,128
CWUR
41[src]of 1,929
ARWU
50[src]of 996
THE
53[src]of 2,119
SCImago
153[src]of 4,699
FWUR
34of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE0.1
  • ARWU2.3
  • CWUR0.5
  • RUR1.5
  • SCImago0.6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
95.9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
97.5THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
98.4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #34 · 97.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
95.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
97.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
98.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 97.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS2021
Not ranked
topuniversities.com
CWUR2025
#41
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#153
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #97 → #174 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼2#40QSNo dataTHE▼1#50ARWU▼6#43CWUR▼2#40RUR▲12#15SCImago▲16#174
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#45
2006#48
2007#53
2008#51
2009#50#97
2010#42#12#96
2011#43#44#11#91
2012#32#42#70#12#90
2013#42#44#60#14#85
2014#36#47#73#14#83
2015#44#48#71#16#73
2016#28#44#70#18#80
2017#28#44#72#13#98
2018#1001#38#44#49#17#157
2019#40#38#42#12#69
2020#1001#41#45#39#14#125
2021#36#42#35#5#128
2022#39#41#37#5#151
2023#49#37#38#27#190
2024#50#43#40#15#174

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Lunds Universitet89.0
2Uppsala Universitet102.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard University美国1.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources