Brandeis University

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1948
Type
Education
ROR
05abbep66
FWUR Rank#572 globally (of 4,980)#128 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 66.9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 198–2,798 (2,600 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#198, most generous score) and SCImago (#2,798, harshest score).

CWUR
198[src]of 1,929
ARWU
301[src]of 996
RUR
369[src]of 1,128
THE
401[src]of 2,119
QS
741[src]of 1,462
SCImago
2,798[src]of 4,699
FWUR
572of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS17.6
  • THE14.2
  • ARWU2.9
  • CWUR22.8
  • RUR0.4
  • SCImago26.5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
55.2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
65.3QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
78.6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #572 · 66.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
55.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
65.3
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
78.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 66.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#198
cwur.org
RUR2025
#369
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2798
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #796 → #2222 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼64#522QS▼164#661THE▲50#251ARWU#301CWUR▲5#234RUR▲12#364SCImago▲128#2222
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#201
2007#203
2008#185#201
2009#201#796
2010#280#201#226#870
2011#318#201#227#965
2012#332#150#201#239#1077
2013#324#201#201#257#1201
2014#164#301#236#236#1239
2015#316#147#201#274#245#1186
2016#381#185#201#229#236#955
2017#401#198#301#232#213#989
2018#411#201#201#250#232#949
2019#429#201#301#147#250#559
2020#468#201#301#186#307#1315
2021#446#201#301#199#315#1498
2022#455#251#301#205#355#1832
2023#497#301#301#239#376#2350
2024#661#251#301#234#364#2222

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Central Florida570.0
2University of Florida Health574.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources