Binghamton University

Updated 2026年5月9日
Country
United States
Founded
1946
Type
Education
ROR
008rmbt77
FWUR Rank#945 globally (of 4,980)#179 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 50.4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–2,013 (1,412 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and QS (#1,001, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2,119
ARWU
601[src]of 996
RUR
658[src]of 1,128
CWUR
713[src]of 1,929
QS
1,001[src]of 1,462
SCImago
2,013[src]of 4,699
FWUR
945of 4,980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS18.8
  • THE21.2
  • ARWU10.7
  • CWUR12.6
  • RUR8.7
  • SCImago6.7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
48.5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
51.6QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
52.4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #945 · 50.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
48.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
51.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
52.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 50.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#713
cwur.org
RUR2025
#658
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2013
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #757 → #1731 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲13#841QS▲30#1001THE#601ARWU#501CWUR▼8#709RUR▲91#599SCImago▲291#1731
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#757
2010#483#783
2011#478#806
2012#601#301#501#998
2013#351#507#1158
2014#606#483#1256
2015#701#647#493#1267
2016#701#351#654#446#1527
2017#701#351#682#502#1230
2018#801#401#901#843#535#1196
2019#801#501#901#753#566#888
2020#801#501#501#630#541#1840
2021#801#501#501#653#570#1602
2022#801#601#601#671#683#1927
2023#1031#601#501#701#690#2022
2024#1001#601#501#709#599#1731

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Montana State University946.0
2Northern Illinois University952.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of Oxford英国5.0
2Tsinghua University中国17.0
3The University of Melbourne澳大利亚27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources