Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
China
Founded
1897
Type
Education
ROR
03893we55
FWUR Rank#839 globally (of 4.980)#135 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 52/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 501–1.963 (1.462 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#1.963, most generous score) and THE (#1.201, harshest score).

ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
885[src]of 1.929
THE
1.201[src]of 2.035
SCImago
1.963[src]of 4.699
FWUR
839of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU4,4
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago4,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
54ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
41THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
54,2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #839 · 52
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
54
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
41
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
54.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 52 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#885
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1963
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3302 → #1743 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼33#953QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▲200#501CWUR▲22#962RURNo dataSCImago▼153#1743
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3302
2010#3412
2011#3467
2012#3445
2013#3191
2014#2841
2015#2480
2016#2106
2017#1569
2018#1112
2019#1085#760
2020#901#1089#1411
2021#1083#1568
2022#801#1011#1774
2023#701#984#1590
2024#501#962#1743

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Beijing Forestry University836.0
2China Pharmaceutical University843.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources