University of South Dakota

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1862
Type
Education
ROR
0043h8f16
FWUR Rank#1.483 globally (of 4.980)#240 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 32/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 606–4.629 (4.023 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.001, most generous score) and SCImago (#4.629, harshest score).

RUR
606[src]of 1.128
THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.588[src]of 1.929
SCImago
4.629[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.483of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE20,8
  • CWUR14,3
  • RUR14,3
  • SCImago30,5

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
1,5SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
52,8THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
32CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,483 · 32
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
1.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
52.8
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
32
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 32 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1588
cwur.org
RUR2025
#606
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#4629
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2423 → #4967 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼75#1490QSNo dataTHE#1001ARWUNo dataCWUR▼8#1535RUR▲11#582SCImago▼165#4967
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2423
2010#353#2180
2011#383#2174
2012#391#1831
2013#398#1634
2014#454#1530
2015#434#1668
2016#351#1103
2017#1216
2018#501#954
2019#601#1325#843
2020#601#1429#2046
2021#801#1420#3290
2022#801#1482#584#4263
2023#1001#1527#593#4802
2024#1001#1535#582#4967

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1The University of Texas at El Paso1477.0
2San José State University1476.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources