University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1898
Type
Education
ROR
01x8rc503
FWUR Rank#2.383 globally (of 4.980)#297 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 23,6/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 100–3.590 (3.490 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped ARWU (#100, most generous score) and CWUR (#1.807, harshest score).

ARWU
100[src]of 993
CWUR
1.807[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.590[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.383of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR8,6
  • SCImago8,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
56,8ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
6,4CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,383 · 23.6
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
56.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
6.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 23.6 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1807
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3590
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2131 → #3249 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼717#1675QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▼4#100CWUR▼754#1771RURNo dataSCImago▲684#3249
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#75
2006#73
2007#68
2008#65
2009#65#2131
2010#69#2136
2011#61#2334
2012#56#2473
2013#57#2809
2014#60#3189
2015#61#3183
2016#63#2631
2017#77#3441
2018#701#666#3036
2019#72#760#1903
2020#79#806#4147
2021#86#850#5235
2022#83#900#4845
2023#96#1017#3933
2024#100#1771#3249

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1The University of Alabama in Huntsville2387.0
2Central Michigan University2379.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources