Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Brazil
Founded
1895
Type
Education
ROR
041yk2d64
FWUR Rank#477 globally (of 4.980)#5 in Brazil
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 71,7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–937 (336 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#937, most generous score) and QS (#691, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2.119
QS
691[src]of 1.462
SCImago
937[src]of 4.699
FWUR
477of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS18,9
  • THE0
  • SCImago8,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
80,1SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
62,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
No data

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #477 · 71.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
80.1
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
62.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
No data
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 71.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR
RUR
SCImago2025
#937
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #1092 → #718 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼7#551QS▲98#691THE#601ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRURNo dataSCImago▲15#718
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1092
2010#1022
2011#971
2012#885
2013#752
2014#648
2015#471#600
2016#451#601#636
2017#461#601#603
2018#501#601#793
2019#601#601#338
2020#651#601#826
2021#701#601#743
2022#751#601#569
2023#789#601#733
2024#691#601#718

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Universidade Estadual Paulista460.0
2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais603.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources