Tufts University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1852
Type
Education
ROR
05wvpxv85
FWUR Rank#232 globally (of 4.980)#71 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 86,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 42–810 (768 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#42, most generous score) and QS (#334, harshest score).

RUR
42[src]of 1.128
CWUR
183[src]of 1.929
THE
189[src]of 2.119
ARWU
201[src]of 996
QS
334[src]of 1.462
SCImago
810[src]of 4.699
FWUR
232of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8,9
  • THE5
  • ARWU6,2
  • CWUR4,5
  • RUR10,3
  • SCImago3,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
81,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
84,2QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
93,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #232 · 86.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
81.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
84.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
93.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 86.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#183
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#810
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #226 → #671 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼13#196QS▼66#379THE▼40#191ARWU#151CWUR▼12#165RUR▼5#42SCImago▲40#671
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#100
2006#102
2007#159#102
2008#157#101
2009#160#101#226
2010#157#101#22#231
2011#174#53#102#22#228
2012#181#77#101#86#28#234
2013#204#87#101#30#247
2014#80#101#84#32#228
2015#214#88#101#95#31#229
2016#252#127#101#97#27#236
2017#238#135#151#98#34#281
2018#243#169#151#154#42#292
2019#237#152#151#94#36#219
2020#253#139#151#122#24#515
2021#260#155#151#134#39#560
2022#275#172#151#145#46#607
2023#313#151#151#153#37#711
2024#379#191#151#165#42#671

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Illinois at Chicago230.0
2Northeastern University, USA226.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources