The University of Memphis

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1912
Type
Education
ROR
01cq23130
FWUR Rank#1.246 globally (of 4.980)#219 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 32,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 488–5.066 (4.578 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#488, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.066, harshest score).

RUR
488[src]of 1.128
ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
1.000[src]of 1.929
THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
QS
1.201[src]of 1.462
SCImago
5.066[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.246of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS21,7
  • THE13,2
  • CWUR8,6
  • RUR17,2
  • SCImago39,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
4,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
35,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
52,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2018/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,246 · 32.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
4.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
35.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
52.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 32.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#1000
cwur.org
RUR2025
#488
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#5066
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1351 → #4259 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲216#1256QS▲176#1201THE#801ARWUNo dataCWUR▼2#989RUR▲159#519SCImago▼98#4259
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006#401
2007#403
2008
2009#1351
2010#1516
2011#1674
2012#1716
2013#1924
2014#716#1917
2015#746#1718
2016#792#1440
2017#798#2170
2018#901#962#2229
2019#912#1286
2020#926#549#3000
2021#801#965#585#3272
2022#801#981#635#3817
2023#1377#801#987#678#4161
2024#1201#801#989#519#4259

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Brescia University1243.0
2Thomas Jefferson University1238.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources