Southern University of Science and Technology

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
China
Founded
2009
Type
Education
ROR
049tv2d57
FWUR Rank#249 globally (of 4.980)#37 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 83,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 101–691 (590 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped ARWU (#101, most generous score) and RUR (#414, harshest score).

ARWU
101[src]of 996
QS
284[src]of 1.469
CWUR
301[src]of 1.929
RUR
414[src]of 1.128
SCImago
691[src]of 4.699
FWUR
249of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU5,1
  • CWUR0,4
  • RUR21,5
  • SCImago0,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
87,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
80,7QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
73,9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #249 · 83.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
87.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
80.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
73.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 83.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE2026
Not ranked
timeshighereducation.com
CWUR2025
#301
cwur.org
RUR2025
#414
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#691
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR climbed #907 → #361 (2019–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲5#313QS#301THENo dataARWU#101CWUR▲70#361RURNo dataSCImago▼8#886
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017#501
2018#501
2019#401#907#884
2020#301#751#2487
2021#301#644#1840
2022#151#487#1247
2023#101#431#878
2024#301#101#361#886

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1China Agricultural University250.0
2Central South University251.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources