Sogang University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1960
Type
Education
ROR
056tn4839
FWUR Rank#937 globally (of 4.980)#31 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 48,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 558–2.578 (2.020 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#801, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

QS
558[src]of 1.462
RUR
612[src]of 1.128
THE
801[src]of 2.119
ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
1.152[src]of 1.929
SCImago
2.578[src]of 4.699
FWUR
937of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS10,9
  • THE11,3
  • CWUR10,6
  • RUR5,1
  • SCImago5,8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
27,3ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
62,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
43,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #937 · 48.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
27.3
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
62.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
43.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 48.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#1152
cwur.org
RUR2025
#612
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2578
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR fell #428 → #1140 (2014–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲111#915QS▼51#509THE▲200#801ARWUNo dataCWUR▼61#1140RUR▲160#589SCImago▲187#2114
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1714
2010#397#1983
2011#392#2074
2012#391#508#2063
2013#401#535#1997
2014#428#509#1850
2015#384#581#588#1601
2016#421#601#769#534#1612
2017#411#501#740#492#1396
2018#441#601#801#961#505#1190
2019#435#601#901#904#548#760
2020#454#801#901#999#507#2075
2021#490#801#1015#514#1808
2022#494#1001#1037#574#2742
2023#458#1001#1079#749#2301
2024#509#801#1140#589#2114

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Chonbuk National University919.0
2Daegu Haany University910.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources