Slovenská technická univerzita v Bratislave

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Slovakia
Founded
1937
Type
Education
ROR
0561ghm58
FWUR Rank#1.958 globally (of 4.980)#5 in Slovakia
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 22,7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 801–5.942 (5.141 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#1.001, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.942, harshest score).

ARWU
801[src]of 993
RUR
803[src]of 1.128
QS
1.001[src]of 1.462
THE
1.501[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.673[src]of 1.929
SCImago
5.942[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.958of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS7,8
  • THE5,4
  • CWUR10,5
  • RUR5,1
  • SCImago23,8

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
9,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
30,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
21,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2018/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,958 · 22.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
9.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
30.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
21.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 22.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#1673
cwur.org
RUR2025
#803
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#5942
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2591 → #5789 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼136#2262QS▼101#1001THE#1501ARWUNo dataCWUR▼35#1672RURNo dataSCImago▼145#5789
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2591
2010#2717
2011#2849
2012#2931
2013#2732
2014#2783
2015#2698
2016#601#2786
2017#801#2334
2018#801#801#2960
2019#751#1001#1392#1903
2020#751#1001#1537#4778
2021#801#1001#1567#4931
2022#801#1201#1629#5250
2023#900#1501#1637#5644
2024#1001#1501#1672#5789

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources