Singapore University of Technology and Design

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Singapore
Founded
2009
Type
Education
ROR
05j6fvn87
FWUR Rank#613 globally (of 4.980)#4 in Singapore
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 59,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 519–901 (382 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#860, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

QS
519[src]of 1.462
SCImago
860[src]of 4.699
CWUR
892[src]of 1.929
ARWU
901[src]of 993
FWUR
613of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0
  • CWUR10,8
  • SCImago17,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
45,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
64,6QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
53,8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2024/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #613 · 59.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
45.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
64.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
53.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 59.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
CWUR2025
#892
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#860
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #2553 → #832 (2014–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲182#699QS#429THENo dataARWU#901CWUR▲25#930RURNo dataSCImago▼5#832
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014#2553
2015#1858
2016#2016
2017#1550
2018#801#1152
2019#801#1199#548
2020#901#1151#1248
2021#901#1071#1111
2022#1012#1083
2023#901#955#827
2024#429#901#930#832

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Singapore Management University608.0
2Nanyang Technological University75.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources