Qingdao University of Science and Technology

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
China
Founded
1950
Type
Education
ROR
041j8js14
FWUR Rank#606 globally (of 4.980)#105 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 65,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–1.075 (474 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#1.075, most generous score) and ARWU (#601, harshest score).

ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
673[src]of 1.929
SCImago
1.075[src]of 4.699
FWUR
606of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU25,4
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago12

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
58,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
65,2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #606 · 65.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
58.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
65.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 65.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#673
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#1075
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3514 → #1154 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲14#698QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU▲200#601CWUR▲69#747RURNo dataSCImago▼92#1154
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3514
2010#3404
2011#3357
2012#3178
2013#2985
2014#2900
2015#3082
2016#3008
2017#1437
2018#1409
2019#1139#907
2020#701#1008#2116
2021#801#960#1695
2022#901#876#1727
2023#801#816#1062
2024#601#747#1154

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1China University of Geosciences Beijing604.0
2Harbin Medical University611.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources