Polytechnic Institute of Paris

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
France
Founded
2019
Type
Education
ROR
042tfbd02
FWUR Rank#42 globally (of 4.980)#1 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 97,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 35–201 (166 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#35, most generous score) and ARWU (#201, harshest score).

CWUR
35[src]of 1.929
QS
41[src]of 1.462
THE
68[src]of 2.119
ARWU
201[src]of 996
FWUR
42of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0,2
  • THE0,2
  • ARWU17,1
  • CWUR1,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
79,9ARWU

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
97,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
98,2CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #42 · 97.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
79.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
97.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
98.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 97.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#35
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

THE fell #351 → #401 (2017–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼61#193QS▲10#38THE▼150#401ARWU#301CWUR#45RURNo dataSCImagoNo data
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017#351
2018#251
2019#201
2020#251#301#35
2021#501#301#41
2022#49#251#301#43
2023#48#251#301#45
2024#38#401#301#45

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Paris-Saclay University44.0
2Sorbonne Université47.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources