Panjab University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
India
Founded
1882
Type
Education
ROR
04p2sbk06
FWUR Rank#1.020 globally (of 4.980)#23 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 34,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–3.801 (3.200 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#601, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

THE
601[src]of 2.119
CWUR
837[src]of 1.929
RUR
883[src]of 1.139
QS
901[src]of 1.462
ARWU
901[src]of 993
SCImago
3.801[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.020of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS9,1
  • THE24,1
  • CWUR9,1
  • SCImago28,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
14,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
55,1QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
39,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2018/2023/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,020 · 34.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
14.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
55.1
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
39.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 34.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#837
cwur.org
RUR2023
#883
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3801
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2148 → #3575 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲438#1114QS▲260#1001THE▲200#601ARWUNo dataCWUR▼64#823RURNo dataSCImago▲496#3575
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2148
2010#439#2290
2011#458#2511
2012#543#2521
2013#608#2478
2014#226#543#590#2395
2015#276#491#629#2501
2016#701#501#511#578#2848
2017#701#601#550#2010
2018#801#601#901#807#2608
2019#601#803#1246
2020#601#726#3185
2021#1001#601#709#3228
2022#1001#601#730#3500
2023#1261#801#759#883#4071
2024#1001#601#823#3575

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Avantika University1027.0
2Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology1028.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources