Okayama University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Japan
Founded
1870
Type
Education
ROR
02pc6pc55
FWUR Rank#900 globally (of 4.980)#18 in Japan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 52,3/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 496–2.323 (1.827 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#554, most generous score) and QS (#951, harshest score).

RUR
496[src]of 1.128
ARWU
501[src]of 996
CWUR
554[src]of 1.929
QS
951[src]of 1.462
THE
1.001[src]of 2.119
SCImago
2.323[src]of 4.699
FWUR
900of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS17,3
  • THE0,5
  • ARWU2,5
  • CWUR19
  • RUR3,8
  • SCImago1,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
50,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
43,9QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
63,7CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #900 · 52.3
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
50.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
43.9
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
63.7
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 52.3 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#554
cwur.org
RUR2025
#496
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2323
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #614 → #1938 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼36#859QS▼278#901THE▲200#801ARWU#501CWUR▼33#533RUR▲23#520SCImago▲52#1938
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#203
2006#301
2007#305
2008#303
2009#303#614
2010#401#301#270#612
2011#401#301#252#630
2012#451#301#288#562
2013#501#301#317#511
2014#401#281#378#536
2015#501#401#245#337#478
2016#551#601#301#279#321#401
2017#501#601#301#290#292#696
2018#501#601#301#389#347#1148
2019#511#801#401#447#374#504
2020#561#801#401#439#359#1403
2021#571#801#401#438#316#1422
2022#581#1001#401#469#334#1601
2023#623#1001#501#500#543#1990
2024#901#801#501#533#520#1938

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Aizu940.0
2Chiba University856.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources