Northeast Forestry University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
China
Founded
1952
Type
Education
ROR
02yxnh564
FWUR Rank#892 globally (of 4.980)#142 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 52,7/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–2.225 (1.624 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#909, most generous score) and ARWU (#601, harshest score).

ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
909[src]of 1.929
SCImago
2.225[src]of 4.699
FWUR
892of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU12,9
  • CWUR0,3
  • SCImago0

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
46,2ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
52,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #892 · 52.7
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
46.2
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
52.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 52.7 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#909
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#2225
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago climbed #3754 → #1761 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲12#1000QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#801CWUR▲63#995RURNo dataSCImago▼79#1761
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3754
2010#3874
2011#4046
2012#3989
2013#3769
2014#3467
2015#3346
2016#2764
2017#1975
2018#2262
2019#1314#1235
2020#1215#2987
2021#1187#2474
2022#1073#2063
2023#801#1058#1682
2024#801#995#1761

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources