National University of Kaohsiung

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Taiwan
Founded
2000
Type
Education
ROR
013zjb662
FWUR Rank#2.851 globally (of 4.980)#46 in Taiwan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 7,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1.028–6.809 (5.781 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped THE (#1.501, most generous score) and SCImago (#6.809, harshest score).

RUR
1.028[src]of 1.128
THE
1.501[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.865[src]of 1.982
SCImago
6.809[src]of 4.699
FWUR
2.851of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE20,3
  • RUR0
  • SCImago9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
7,5CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2019/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #2,851 · 7.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
7.5
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 7.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2019
#1865
cwur.org
RUR2025
#1028
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#6809
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2594 → #6805 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼550#2719QSNo dataTHE#1501ARWUNo dataCWURNo dataRUR▼85#972SCImago▲64#6805
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2594
2010#2715
2011#2782
2012#2805
2013#2689
2014#2803
2015#2679
2016#3468
2017#699#3611
2018#1001#668#4163
2019#1001#1865#786#2809
2020#1001#769#5960
2021#1001#6195
2022#1201#943#6993
2023#1501#887#6869
2024#1501#972#6805

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ming Chuan University2853.0
2Chang Jung Christian University2824.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources