Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Russian Federation
Founded
1946
Type
Education
ROR
00v0z9322
FWUR Rank#591 globally (of 4.980)#4 in Russian Federation
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 65,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 116–4.218 (4.102 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#116, most generous score) and SCImago (#4.218, harshest score).

RUR
116[src]of 1.128
THE
351[src]of 2.119
QS
477[src]of 1.462
CWUR
523[src]of 1.929
ARWU
601[src]of 996
SCImago
4.218[src]of 4.699
FWUR
591of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS1,5
  • THE17,6
  • ARWU26,1
  • CWUR7
  • RUR23,9
  • SCImago55,6

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
25ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
75,5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
81,4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #591 · 65.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
25
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
75.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
81.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 65.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#523
cwur.org
RUR2025
#116
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#4218
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

THE climbed #501 → #201 (2016–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼65#487QS▼148#415THE#201ARWU#501CWUR▼13#523RUR▲9#116SCImago▼222#3449
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3415
2010#318#3607
2011#305#3724
2012#358#3821
2013#441#360#4058
2014#358#3683
2015#411#250#391#3614
2016#431#501#218#344#3320
2017#350#301#501#242#294#2727
2018#355#251#401#556#256#2960
2019#312#251#401#539#216#1189
2020#302#201#401#580#151#2576
2021#281#201#501#542#106#2134
2022#290#201#501#528#97#2888
2023#267#201#501#510#125#3227
2024#415#201#501#523#116#3449

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1National Research Nuclear University MEPI605.0
2Tomsk State University609.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources