Lunds Universitet

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Sweden
Founded
1666
Type
Education
ROR
012a77v79
FWUR Rank#89 globally (of 4.980)#2 in Sweden
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 94,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 51–334 (283 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#51, most generous score) and ARWU (#101, harshest score).

RUR
51[src]of 1.128
QS
72[src]of 1.462
THE
95[src]of 2.119
ARWU
101[src]of 996
CWUR
130[src]of 1.929
SCImago
334[src]of 4.699
FWUR
89of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0,9
  • THE1,3
  • ARWU4,3
  • CWUR0,9
  • RUR1,3
  • SCImago1,3

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
91,4ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
95,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
94,4CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #89 · 94.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
91.4
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
95.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
94.4
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 94.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#130
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#334
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #128 → #282 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#30020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲5#96QS▲10#85THE▲13#106ARWU▲50#101CWUR▼4#145RUR▲11#55SCImago▲24#282
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#99
2006#90
2007#106#97
2008#88#97
2009#67#101#128
2010#72#101#64#119
2011#86#89#102#59#121
2012#71#80#101#109#120
2013#67#82#101#163#114
2014#60#123#101#116#168#112
2015#60#119#101#117#175#112
2016#70#90#101#127#105#111
2017#73#96#101#128#89#144
2018#78#93#101#95#102#212
2019#92#98#101#141#44#99
2020#92#96#151#136#49#212
2021#97#103#151#141#77#245
2022#87#116#151#143#68#254
2023#95#119#151#141#66#306
2024#85#106#101#145#55#282

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Uppsala Universitet102.0
2Kungliga Tekniska högskolan113.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources