Lanzhou University of Technology

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
China
Founded
1919
Type
Education
ROR
03panb555
FWUR Rank#1.327 globally (of 4.980)#193 in China
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 36,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 601–6.809 (6.208 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped ARWU (#601, most generous score) and SCImago (#6.809, harshest score).

ARWU
601[src]of 996
CWUR
1.219[src]of 1.929
SCImago
6.809[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.327of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • ARWU2,9
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago36,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
19,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
36,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,327 · 36.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
19.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
36.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 36.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#1219
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#6809
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #3641 → #6817 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲243#1608QSNo dataTHENo dataARWU#701CWUR▲110#1292RURNo dataSCImago▼3115#6817
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#3641
2010#3709
2011#3761
2012#3816
2013#3820
2014#3608
2015#3463
2016#3084
2017#2810
2018#2940
2019#1667#2415
2020#1623#5117
2021#1554#4707
2022#1485#4674
2023#1402#3702
2024#701#1292#6817

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1China Three Gorges University1325.0
2Dongguan University of Technology1324.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources