Kent State University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1910
Type
Education
ROR
049pfb863
FWUR Rank#1.224 globally (of 4.980)#216 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 43/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 576–2.814 (2.238 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#863, most generous score) and ARWU (#701, harshest score).

RUR
576[src]of 1.128
ARWU
701[src]of 996
THE
801[src]of 1.639
CWUR
863[src]of 1.929
QS
1.001[src]of 1.462
SCImago
2.814[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.224of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS8,7
  • ARWU10,5
  • CWUR15,1
  • RUR8,8
  • SCImago0,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
34,9ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
41,4QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
52,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2022/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,224 · 43
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
34.9
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
41.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
52.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 43 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#863
cwur.org
RUR2025
#576
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#2814
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1652 → #2532 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲126#1221QS▲60#1001THENo dataARWU#701CWUR▼20#810RUR▲19#575SCImago▲829#2532
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#401
2006
2007
2008
2009#1652
2010#401#1778
2011#196#401#1800
2012#301#401#451#1983
2013#401#512#2143
2014#401#586#534#2076
2015#571#586#1935
2016#701#501#568#608#2190
2017#701#401#401#566#469#1649
2018#801#501#401#687#435#1381
2019#751#501#501#693#457#836
2020#801#601#501#743#429#2129
2021#801#801#501#752#430#2643
2022#1001#801#601#772#506#2576
2023#1061#701#790#594#3361
2024#1001#701#810#575#2532

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1New Mexico State University1212.0
2Thomas Jefferson University1238.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources