Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
France
Founded
1969
Type
Education
ROR
033p9g875
FWUR Rank#1.071 globally (of 4.980)#57 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 31,9/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 774–3.200 (2.426 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#774, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

CWUR
774[src]of 1.929
ARWU
901[src]of 996
SCImago
3.200[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.071of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR14
  • SCImago14

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
20,8ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
59,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2019/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,071 · 31.9
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
20.8
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
59.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 31.9 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#774
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3200
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1163 → #2405 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼142#843QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲20#728RURNo dataSCImago▼475#2405
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1163
2010#1088
2011#1090
2012#959
2013#910
2014#568#851
2015#580#877
2016#567#805
2017#563#1040
2018#801#530#1338
2019#901#550#643
2020#592#1327
2021#624#1704
2022#716#1679
2023#748#1930
2024#728#2405

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources