Inje University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1979
Type
Education
ROR
04xqwq985
FWUR Rank#1.268 globally (of 4.980)#40 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 25,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 901–3.486 (2.585 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#929, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

ARWU
901[src]of 993
CWUR
929[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.486[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.268of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR13
  • SCImago13

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
17,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
51,9CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,268 · 25.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
17.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
51.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 25.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
THE
CWUR2025
#929
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3486
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2513 → #2716 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲80#1055QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲8#909RURNo dataSCImago▲315#2716
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2513
2010#2436
2011#2506
2012#2529
2013#2263
2014#768#1989
2015#813#2064
2016#842#2323
2017#701#879#1948
2018#801#888#2331
2019#901#911#876
2020#901#892#2416
2021#900#2505
2022#916#2478
2023#917#3031
2024#909#2716

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1CHA University1267.0
2Sangmyung University1256.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources