Indian Institute of Technology, BHU

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
India
Founded
1919
Type
Education
ROR
01kh5gc44
FWUR Rank#1.626 globally (of 4.980)#70 in India
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 30/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 566–5.137 (4.571 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#566, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.137, harshest score).

QS
566[src]of 1.462
CWUR
1.351[src]of 1.929
SCImago
5.137[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.626of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS31,3
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago30

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
61,4QS

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
30CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,626 · 30
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
61.4
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
30
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 30 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1351
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5137
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1840 → #4390 (2019–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼13#1756QS▲96#571THENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲38#1439RURNo dataSCImago▲591#4390
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019#1519#1840
2020#1565#4784
2021#1529#4454
2022#1567#4520
2023#667#1477#4981
2024#571#1439#4390

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources