Incheon National University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
South Korea
Founded
1979
Type
Education
ROR
02xf7p935
FWUR Rank#1.615 globally (of 4.980)#48 in South Korea
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 36,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.14 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 4 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 65–3.594 (3.529 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped QS (#65, most generous score) and SCImago (#3.594, harshest score).

QS
65[src]of 683
THE
1.201[src]of 2.119
CWUR
1.346[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.594[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.615of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE13,1
  • CWUR0
  • SCImago6,7

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
23,5SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
67QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
30,3CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2013/2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,615 · 36.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
23.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
67
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
30.3
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 36.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

ARWU
CWUR2025
#1346
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#3594
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2837 → #3244 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼133#1669QSNo dataTHE#1201ARWUNo dataCWUR▲2#1420RURNo dataSCImago▼177#3244
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007#65
2008#93
2009#98#2837
2010#66#2995
2011#62#3270
2012#60#3254
2013#65#2749
2014#3133
2015#3442
2016#3160
2017#2434
2018#2423
2019#1001#1478#1131
2020#1001#1541#3210
2021#1001#1498#2481
2022#1001#1475#2780
2023#1201#1422#3067
2024#1201#1420#3244

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Dankook University1605.0
2Jeju National University1646.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources