Hautes Etudes Commerciales

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
France
Founded
1881
Type
Education
ROR
0423jsj19
FWUR Rank#1.205 globally (of 4.980)#65 in France
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 54,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 334–9.617 (9.283 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#334, most generous score) and SCImago (#9.617, harshest score).

CWUR
334[src]of 1.929
RUR
519[src]of 1.139
SCImago
9.617[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.205of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR41,4
  • SCImago41,4

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
No data

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
68,6CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2023/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,205 · 54.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
No data
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
68.6
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 54.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS2021
Not ranked
topuniversities.com
THE
ARWU
CWUR2025
#334
cwur.org
RUR2023
#519
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#9617
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

CWUR climbed #589 → #273 (2018–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼367#1152QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▲7#273RURNo dataSCImago▲642#5425
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010#363
2011#344
2012#489
2013#541
2014#381
2015
2016
2017
2018#1001#589
2019#185
2020#1001#205#5617
2021#252#4555
2022#266#4887
2023#280#519#6067
2024#273#5425

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Université de Technologie de Compiègne1203.0
2Université de Franche-Comté1168.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources