Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Netherlands
Founded
1913
Type
Education
ROR
057w15z03
FWUR Rank#116 globally (of 4.980)#5 in Netherlands
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 92,4/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 101–220 (119 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped SCImago (#220, most generous score) and RUR (#115, harshest score).

ARWU
101[src]of 996
THE
107[src]of 2.119
CWUR
111[src]of 1.929
RUR
115[src]of 1.128
QS
140[src]of 1.462
SCImago
220[src]of 4.699
FWUR
116of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS1,9
  • THE2,6
  • ARWU2,5
  • CWUR1,9
  • RUR2,5
  • SCImago2,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
92,6ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
92,7QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
92,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #116 · 92.4
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
92.6
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
92.7
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
92.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 92.4 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#111
cwur.org
RUR2025
#115
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#220
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #133 → #199 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#20020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼30#121QS▲32#176THE▼19#99ARWU▼13#101CWUR▼7#101RUR▼44#122SCImago▲13#199
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#201
2007#163#151
2008#126#152
2009#108#152#133
2010#99#151#91#126
2011#103#159#151#86#119
2012#99#157#151#83#105
2013#92#72#151#71#103
2014#91#73#151#101#67#90
2015#90#72#151#85#56#84
2016#126#71#101#91#53#72
2017#144#69#73#85#84#116
2018#147#72#79#106#80#190
2019#179#70#68#98#87#98
2020#183#69#80#92#136#194
2021#197#72#101#96#125#193
2022#179#72#87#95#133#172
2023#208#80#88#94#78#212
2024#176#99#101#101#122#199

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Rijksuniversiteit Groningen106.0
2Technische Universiteit Delft128.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources