East Carolina University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1907
Type
Education
ROR
01vx35703
FWUR Rank#1.011 globally (of 4.980)#192 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 34,5/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 566–3.663 (3.097 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#566, most generous score) and ARWU (#901, harshest score).

RUR
566[src]of 1.128
ARWU
901[src]of 993
THE
1.001[src]of 1.506
CWUR
1.005[src]of 1.929
SCImago
3.663[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.011of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR0
  • RUR2
  • SCImago25,9

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
15,7ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
33,6THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
48,9CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2020/2021/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,011 · 34.5
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
15.7
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
33.6
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
48.9
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 34.5 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#1005
cwur.org
RUR2025
#566
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#3663
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1574 → #3643 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼134#1122QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼13#976RUR▲19#594SCImago▲399#3643
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1574
2010#422#1852
2011#421#1975
2012#498#1833
2013#536#1699
2014#718#539#1627
2015#762#585#1418
2016#751#1524
2017#752#1771
2018#835#2161
2019#801#701#838#652#1225
2020#901#834#594#3272
2021#1001#898#582#3182
2022#961#652#3147
2023#963#613#4042
2024#976#594#3643

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1University of Rhode Island1012.0
2Baylor University1021.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources