Danmarks Tekniske Universitet

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Denmark
Founded
1829
Type
Education
ROR
04qtj9h94
FWUR Rank#126 globally (of 4.980)#3 in Denmark
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 92,1/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.16 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 6 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 35–373 (338 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#35, most generous score) and ARWU (#151, harshest score).

RUR
35[src]of 1.128
QS
107[src]of 1.462
THE
121[src]of 2.119
ARWU
151[src]of 996
CWUR
206[src]of 1.929
SCImago
373[src]of 4.699
FWUR
126of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • QS0,6
  • THE2,2
  • ARWU7,2
  • CWUR2,8
  • RUR4,9
  • SCImago0,1

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
88,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
93,5QS + THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
93,2CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #126 · 92.1
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
88.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
93.5
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
93.2
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 92.1 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

CWUR2025
#206
cwur.org
SCImago2025
#373
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #170 → #329 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#30020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼2#127QS▼17#121THE▲40#126ARWU#151CWUR▼3#200RUR▼10#46SCImago▼31#329
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005#153
2006#151
2007#130#151
2008#133#152
2009#159#152#170
2010#141#151#130#179
2011#150#122#151#127#185
2012#132#178#151#167#182
2013#134#149#151#137#183
2014#125#117#101#197#96#181
2015#123#121#101#174#100#182
2016#112#167#151#168#97#152
2017#109#176#151#144#68#172
2018#116#153#151#215#43#233
2019#112#163#101#213#27#116
2020#112#184#151#200#40#239
2021#103#187#151#196#32#256
2022#99#185#151#193#23#278
2023#104#166#151#197#36#298
2024#121#126#151#200#46#329

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Aarhus Universitet109.0
2Københavns Universitet56.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources