Creighton University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
United States
Founded
1878
Type
Education
ROR
05wf30g94
FWUR Rank#1.321 globally (of 4.980)#225 in United States
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 29,8/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.15 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 5 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 396–5.202 (4.806 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped RUR (#396, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.202, harshest score).

RUR
396[src]of 1.128
ARWU
451[src]of 494
THE
1.001[src]of 1.765
CWUR
1.213[src]of 1.929
SCImago
5.202[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.321of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • CWUR0
  • RUR27,8
  • SCImago37,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
4,5ARWU + SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
43,3THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
51,1CWUR + RUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2003/2023/2025). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,321 · 29.8
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
4.5
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
43.3
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
51.1
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 29.8 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
CWUR2025
#1213
cwur.org
RUR2025
#396
roundranking.com
SCImago2025
#5202
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #1477 → #4656 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▼133#1202QSNo dataTHENo dataARWUNo dataCWUR▼50#1136RUR▼67#413SCImago▼518#4656
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#1477
2010#223#1625
2011#226#1811
2012#226#292#1913
2013#301#289#1840
2014#276#490#291#1766
2015#301#508#311#2003
2016#523#228#1882
2017#501#545#282#1841
2018#501#862#235#1795
2019#501#966#243#1007
2020#601#982#265#2777
2021#601#1004#288#2803
2022#801#1056#385#3828
2023#1001#1086#346#4138
2024#1136#413#4656

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Loyola University Chicago1315.0
2Marquette University1304.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
2Tsinghua UniversityChina17.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources