Chuo University

Updated 9 de mai. de 2026
Country
Japan
Founded
1885
Type
Education
ROR
03qvqb743
FWUR Rank#1.669 globally (of 4.980)#60 in Japan
FWUR rank

Where the rankings agree — and where they don't

Methodology in active development · v0.1
Consensus 29,2/ 100Trimmed Mean v0.13 of 6 agenciesDivergent agency signal

But the 3 rankings disagree about this institution.

Range: rank 1.240–5.154 (3.914 positions apart).

Headline composite trimmed: dropped CWUR (#1.240, most generous score) and SCImago (#5.154, harshest score).

CWUR
1.240[src]of 1.929
THE
1.501[src]of 2.119
SCImago
5.154[src]of 4.699
FWUR
1.669of 4.980

Distance from FWUR composite

Diagnostic only

Per-agency absolute distance from the trimmed-mean composite, in score space (0–100). Display only — does not feed back into the composite or any agency-quality measure. Lower means the agency reads this institution closer to the consensus.

  • THE0
  • CWUR6,6
  • SCImago29,2

Why the divergence?

Research-oriented agencies
0SCImago

Research output, citations, and bibliometric coverage.

Reputation-sensitive agencies
29,2THE

Academic and employer reputation surveys.

Hybrid agencies
35,8CWUR

Mixed pillars including outcome and balance metrics.

Cycle alignment: agencies' latest publications mix years (2025/2026). Treat year-over-year deltas with care.

FWUR is a transparent synthesis of six published rankings — not a direct measurement of educational or research quality.

Try other agency subsets

Adjust the weights below to see how the consensus shifts. Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Pick your agencies (Mode C)

Toggle agencies to see how the composite + rank shift. The default is all six.

Default (Trimmed Mean, all 6) · #1,669 · 29.2
= canonical FWUR rank (toggle agencies off to customize)

Custom views are not the canonical FWUR rank.

Re-rank with your priorities

Slide the weights below. The composite, dimension scores, and methodology label update live.

Research33%
Research output and citations · ARWU + SCImago
0
Reputation33%
Academic and employer surveys · QS + THE
29.2
Outcome33%
Employability and balanced pillars · CWUR + RUR
35.8
Default (Trimmed Mean) · 29.2 / 100

Source observations · inputs to FWUR rank

QS
ARWU
CWUR2025
#1240
cwur.org
RUR
SCImago2025
#5154
scimagoir.com

Ranking trajectory · 2005–2024

SCImago fell #2869 → #4723 (2009–2024)

2024
#1#100#200#300#400#50020052009201420192024YEAR 2024FWUR▲138#2019QSNo dataTHE#1501ARWUNo dataCWUR▼9#1121RURNo dataSCImago▲1246#4723
Show as table (accessible fallback)
YearQSTHEARWUCWURRURSCImago
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009#2869
2010#3042
2011#3364
2012#3367
2013#3427
2014#3346
2015#3050
2016#2204
2017#801#2865
2018#801#2792
2019#1001#899#1698
2020#1001#985#4619
2021#1001#1029#5518
2022#1201#1085#5307
2023#1501#1112#5969
2024#1501#1121#4723

Peer comparison cohort

Same country

#InstitutionStudentsAvg rank
1Ehime University1671.0
2Hirosaki University1674.0

Global peers

#InstitutionCountryStudentsAvg rank
1Harvard UniversityEstados Unidos1.0
2University of OxfordReino Unido5.0
3The University of MelbourneAustrália27.0

Where these numbers come from

Licensing: Each ranking agency licenses its full data and methodology under terms specific to that agency. FWUR exposes per-cycle headline ranks under fair-use citation; for sub-indicator scores or commercial use, refer to each agency's licensing page. ADR-040 §결정 4 forbids constructing per-pillar "FWUR Teaching/Research/Reputation Score" naming until ≥4 of 6 agencies grant sub-indicator licensing.

Sources